Talk:Staff: Difference between revisions

From PokéFarm Q Official Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎New Content: new section)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


I think the new version of this page looks very cool. I don't know about having the PF1 details though, since this wiki is supposed to be about PFQ. The responsibilities could possibly be expanded upon further rather than copypasta'd from the staff roster. I also don't know if the table tips are needed, the table itself seems intuitive enough to read as is. -[[User:Zephyr Foxworth|Zephyr Foxworth]] ([[User talk:Zephyr Foxworth|talk]]) 08:05, 22 July 2014 (BST)
I think the new version of this page looks very cool. I don't know about having the PF1 details though, since this wiki is supposed to be about PFQ. The responsibilities could possibly be expanded upon further rather than copypasta'd from the staff roster. I also don't know if the table tips are needed, the table itself seems intuitive enough to read as is. -[[User:Zephyr Foxworth|Zephyr Foxworth]] ([[User talk:Zephyr Foxworth|talk]]) 08:05, 22 July 2014 (BST)
::Thank you, I'm glad you like it! I originally thought the same, but when I asked for the official staff records for PFQ, all those positions were included on it. Also, just because this is the PFQ Wiki, does not mean that all information on the PF1 Wiki is automatically off-limits, especially not with issues that directly affect PFQ matters. Look at Garthic's history, for example, it's a lot easier to see why he was made a Admin on PFQ after taking into account the amount of Staff experience he had from PF1, and a lot of other Staff members are the same way.
::The position descriptions (responsibilities) were not copy and pasted, they were all individually written by me. I did, however, base them off the information found on the Roster. The tooltips are there for users who are not familiar with PF1, but the repetition bothers me.  If you have a solution to this, I would love to hear it. Thank you for your comments! -signed, [[User:KingVesper|KingVesper]] ([[User talk:KingVesper|talk]]) 08:20, 22 July 2014 (BST)

Revision as of 07:20, 22 July 2014

Should there be a section for retired staff, i.e., Acree? Also, someone should grab the various userbar ranks for staff and add them to the respective sections of this page. --Peridot Prior (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2014 (BST) I'm not sure a section for retired staff is necessary, as they're no longer staff. It isn't a record, but a list of current staff. --Luggs (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2014 (BST) Maybe a separate page as record, then? --Tirea Niwn (talk) 03:22, 22 July 2014 (BST)

I don't think that will be necessary as I plan on completely rewriting the Staff page, using a completely new structure. Hopefully it will be ready by tomorrow, but I won't make promises. Once the new staff page is up, this can be brought up again, but until then, I ask that you be patient with me. Feel free to check out my Sandbox, it has the completed Staff Table that will be featured on the new page. -signed, KingVesper (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2014 (BST)
The new Staff page is now up and running. Any new concerns should discussed by opening up new topics. Thank you. -signed, KingVesper (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2014 (BST)

New Content

I think the new version of this page looks very cool. I don't know about having the PF1 details though, since this wiki is supposed to be about PFQ. The responsibilities could possibly be expanded upon further rather than copypasta'd from the staff roster. I also don't know if the table tips are needed, the table itself seems intuitive enough to read as is. -Zephyr Foxworth (talk) 08:05, 22 July 2014 (BST)

Thank you, I'm glad you like it! I originally thought the same, but when I asked for the official staff records for PFQ, all those positions were included on it. Also, just because this is the PFQ Wiki, does not mean that all information on the PF1 Wiki is automatically off-limits, especially not with issues that directly affect PFQ matters. Look at Garthic's history, for example, it's a lot easier to see why he was made a Admin on PFQ after taking into account the amount of Staff experience he had from PF1, and a lot of other Staff members are the same way.
The position descriptions (responsibilities) were not copy and pasted, they were all individually written by me. I did, however, base them off the information found on the Roster. The tooltips are there for users who are not familiar with PF1, but the repetition bothers me. If you have a solution to this, I would love to hear it. Thank you for your comments! -signed, KingVesper (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2014 (BST)