Talk:Staff: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
KingVesper (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
KingVesper (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Maybe a separate page as record, then? --[[User:Tirea Niwn|Tirea Niwn]] ([[User talk:Tirea Niwn|talk]]) 03:22, 22 July 2014 (BST) | Maybe a separate page as record, then? --[[User:Tirea Niwn|Tirea Niwn]] ([[User talk:Tirea Niwn|talk]]) 03:22, 22 July 2014 (BST) | ||
:I don't think that will be necessary as I plan on completely rewriting the Staff page, using a completely new structure. Hopefully it will be ready by tomorrow, but I won't make promises. Once the new staff page is up, this can be brought up again, but until then, I ask that you be patient with me. Feel free to check out my [[User:KingVesper/Sandbox|Sandbox]], it has the completed Staff Table that will be featured on the new page. -signed, [[User:KingVesper|KingVesper]] ([[User talk:KingVesper|talk]]) 03:58, 22 July 2014 (BST) | :I don't think that will be necessary as I plan on completely rewriting the Staff page, using a completely new structure. Hopefully it will be ready by tomorrow, but I won't make promises. Once the new staff page is up, this can be brought up again, but until then, I ask that you be patient with me. Feel free to check out my [[User:KingVesper/Sandbox|Sandbox]], it has the completed Staff Table that will be featured on the new page. -signed, [[User:KingVesper|KingVesper]] ([[User talk:KingVesper|talk]]) 03:58, 22 July 2014 (BST) | ||
::The new Staff page is now up and running. Any new concerns should discussed by opening up new topics. Thank you. -signed, [[User:KingVesper|KingVesper]] ([[User talk:KingVesper|talk]]) 07:25, 22 July 2014 (BST) |
Revision as of 06:25, 22 July 2014
Should there be a section for retired staff, i.e., Acree? Also, someone should grab the various userbar ranks for staff and add them to the respective sections of this page. --Peridot Prior (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2014 (BST) I'm not sure a section for retired staff is necessary, as they're no longer staff. It isn't a record, but a list of current staff. --Luggs (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2014 (BST) Maybe a separate page as record, then? --Tirea Niwn (talk) 03:22, 22 July 2014 (BST)
- I don't think that will be necessary as I plan on completely rewriting the Staff page, using a completely new structure. Hopefully it will be ready by tomorrow, but I won't make promises. Once the new staff page is up, this can be brought up again, but until then, I ask that you be patient with me. Feel free to check out my Sandbox, it has the completed Staff Table that will be featured on the new page. -signed, KingVesper (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2014 (BST)
- The new Staff page is now up and running. Any new concerns should discussed by opening up new topics. Thank you. -signed, KingVesper (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2014 (BST)