Talk:Summon Items: Difference between revisions
(New section) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Or just do it now. I ''will'' delete pages that contain PF1 information, until people stop doing it. --[[User:Niet the Dark Absol|Niet the Dark Absol]] ([[User talk:Niet the Dark Absol|talk]]) 10:52, 29 June 2014 (BST) | : Or just do it now. I ''will'' delete pages that contain PF1 information, until people stop doing it. --[[User:Niet the Dark Absol|Niet the Dark Absol]] ([[User talk:Niet the Dark Absol|talk]]) 10:52, 29 June 2014 (BST) | ||
==Table format and coding== | |||
Since Niet has suggested the table be split or reformatted somehow I thought I'd bring up this discussion section. How should the table be formatted? Since one large table is too long. I would also like to mention the excessive CSS styling in the table. The styling makes the table look very similar as a wikitable, so should it just be a wikitable (class="wikitable")? -[[User:Lugia101101|Lugia101101]] ([[User talk:Lugia101101|talk]]) 17:17, 1 August 2014 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 16:17, 1 August 2014
"Out with the old..."
Since there are new Summon Items for PFQ, I feel that the old/unconfimed images listed on the page be removed soon. I propose the following:
At reset, Wednesday evening, any non-confirmed item is to be removed from the list. If you can confirm an item is currently correct, post it in this discussion thread.
As of now, I can confirm Articuno, Zapdos, Moltres, Mew, Jirachi, Victini, and Diancie. I believe I have seen Xerneas and Yveltel's items on the forums at one point or another, so I believe those are also fine. -Zephyr Foxworth (talk) 08:05, 29 June 2014 (BST)
- Or just do it now. I will delete pages that contain PF1 information, until people stop doing it. --Niet the Dark Absol (talk) 10:52, 29 June 2014 (BST)
Table format and coding
Since Niet has suggested the table be split or reformatted somehow I thought I'd bring up this discussion section. How should the table be formatted? Since one large table is too long. I would also like to mention the excessive CSS styling in the table. The styling makes the table look very similar as a wikitable, so should it just be a wikitable (class="wikitable")? -Lugia101101 (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2014 (BST)
